1070 vs 1660 ti

Overpriced laptops dream. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. The GTX is rated at just Watts.

Costing just a little bit more than the GTX Ti at time of writing, is there any hope at all that the GTX might still be worth buying? Let's find out with the help of some lovely graphs. Paired with my Intel Core iK CPU and 16GB of Corsair Vengeance MHz RAM, I've seen what each card can do on max settings at each resolution and taken an average frame rate either from their own built-in benchmarks or from my own repeated manual gameplay tests to see how they stack up against each other. In the case of x gameplay, I've also looked at what each one is capable on High quality settings, too. Both are some of the faster varieties of their respective cards out there, so the results below are probably more of a best-case scenario for what each one's capable of across the different resolutions and graphics settings, but I'm also confident that slower cards will be very much in the same sort of ballpark. On Ultra settings at x, both cards are pretty much capable of delivering 60fps right off the bat in a variety of games. The GTX struggled with Assassin's Creed Odyssey's Ultra High settings a bit, and both had a tough time with Metro Exodus' turned up to eleven see my Metro Exodus graphics performance guide for a full breakdown of what I consider 'Ultra' settings here , but on the whole you're looking at a smooth minimum of at least 55fps in most cases, making both cards perfectly suited to flawless p play.

1070 vs 1660 ti

Help us by suggesting a value. Overview Prices Reviews Specs. Comparison winner. Scroll down for more details. Which are the most popular comparisons? Cheap alternatives 6. Write a review. Features Value for money 9. Gaming 9. Performance 9. Quiet operation 9. Reliability Highest score Lowest score Most helpful Most recent Oldest.

Address copied to clipboard. Slightly faster NBody calculation.

As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The reference GPU clock speeds are MHz and MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX and offer something more value-led in the mid-range. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. The GTX is rated at just Watts. We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games.

It seemed pretty clean-cut until Nvidia unleashed their Series. These were new cards boasting almost identical Turing Line architecture to the RTX series -albeit without their specialized cores. So, what actually is the difference between these familiar GPUs? Actually…quite a lot. GTX contains 16nm Pascal microarchitecture in which an SM streaming multiprocessors can contain between 60 and CUDA cores a piece that are responsible for all the graphical computations that end up as the image and movement you see. Why should the newer model have fewer cores? These architectures also differ in clock speeds.

1070 vs 1660 ti

This established card is available in wider numbers for a similar price, so which is the better mid-range option: the GTX Ti or the GTX ? On the face of it, the GTX Ti seems to have the edge. It's also more efficient, with many models packing significant horsepower into a compact one-fan or two-fan design. It also comes with some new Turing features, such as support for variable rate shading, which could boost performance in some games. The best way to see which card is the best overall is to put them to the test, so that's what we're going to do. We have tested both GPUs in nine recent and not-so-recent games, so you will be able to see precisely which games favour the GTX Ti and which go the other way in our benchmarks below. We'll also take a quick look at how these cards compare in terms of features, and how much you can expect to pay for each one. However, Nvidia's Turing cards does include new features that don't rely on its specialist cores, and these have made the jump to the GTX Ti.

Air max 95 red and black

The combined score is measured on a point scale. Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Better peak reflection handling. Render target array GShader Sphere Newer versions introduce more functionality and better performance. Overclocked Score. What is the effective GPU speed index? Faster peak NBody calculation. Now we've got all that preamble out of the way, let's dive into those lovely graphs, shall we? Sticking with Ultra settings for a moment, we can see the GTX Ti is also the superior graphics card at x resolutions, too. If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission. The GTX is rated at just Watts. A wider bus width means that it can carry more data per cycle. Force Splatted Flocking Swarm List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by itself is no hindrance at all. The reference GPU clock speeds are MHz and MHz for base and boost respectively, and manufacturer overclocked speeds will be higher. Perhaps this will be an impetus for AMD to adjust pricing for the RX and offer something more value-led in the mid-range.

As you'll see from the graph below, which mainly focuses on the games that didn't already result in scores of nearfps back on Ultra, the GTX Ti once again takes the lead in practically every game going. Sticking with Ultra settings for a moment, we can see the GTX Ti is also the superior graphics card at x resolutions, too. Overclocked Score. The higher, the better. GPU memory speed MHz. In the case of x gameplay, I've also looked at what each one is capable on High quality settings, too. It was discontinued in April , and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. The same goes for playing games on High settings at x as well. Allows you to connect to a display using mini-DisplayPort. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. Faster peak NBody calculation. What is the UBM value for money rating?