Bypass youtube adblock detection reddit
A reliable way I found to confirm whether there is new anti-content blocker code released by Youtube is to visit uBlockOrigin's reddit sub[1]: If there are well over 1, "here now" near top rightthis confirms the anti-content blocker code has been updated. If well below 1, "here now", all is fine.
Happened in Edge, then i went to watch youtube on chrome until it happened there too, it really helped. Yup, been using that method for about two weeks and it works fine. Brave browser block it by default, also there is a webpage on the ublock reddit where you can track the update of the script as Google updates the configuration to block ads twice a day. Also you can try " Fadblock " extension. Plays the ads in 50ms, so you aren't technically blocking t he adds and the popup doesn't show.
Bypass youtube adblock detection reddit
.
Other people's mileage may differ, of course. Who didn't want to eat Reese's pieces, drink a Pepsi free or tab, or buy a Toyota or pair of Nikes. A weekend with VPN access and the right protocols could make my entire usage of the site obsolete.
.
Ad-blockers are a godsend for people who are tired of watching ads on YouTube. Not only do they save time, but they also keep your data secure and make web browsing more efficient. Luckily, there are still some methods that you can use to bypass adblock detection. The reason why YouTube is stopping users with ad-blockers is because ads help the platform make money. Earlier this year, YouTube declared war on ad-blockers. They could only proceed by enabling ads or by getting YouTube Premium. Most ads on YouTube appear before a video starts, and also in the middle of the video. YouTube does that for them, but it depends on whether the content is advertiser-friendly or not. Running ads on the platform is the only way for YouTube to continue providing its services to users for free.
Bypass youtube adblock detection reddit
YouTube is running an experiment asking some users to disable their ad blockers or pay for a premium subscription, or they will not be allowed to watch videos. As first spotted by a Reddit user this week, YouTube will display a pop-up warning some users that "ad blockers are not allowed. Ads allow YouTube to stay free for billions of users worldwide," the message adds. Upon receiving this notification, users will have two options: either disable their ad blocker to allow YouTube ads or consider subscribing to YouTube Premium to get rid of all advertisements. As explained in the pop-up, "you can go ad-free with YouTube Premium, and creators can still get paid from your subscription.
Hotnackedgirls
Saris 3 months ago root parent next [—] What about someone who gets several million views per video they upload? We don't want to go somewhere else unless we can help it, and are willing to fight for a better internet. Saris 3 months ago root parent next [—] Can you explain it a little? Don't play the game. If content creators don't think they get anything out of enabling advertising on YouTube, then they'll stop or move to other platforms which are not based on providing algorithmically generated feeds with interspersed ads based on user profiles. It was rolled out to me. Worked every time so far and it's been a while since I got the nag screen. If someone who spends less of their time watching Clara's videos chooses to support Clara because they value her content more than Vincent's, or because they feel like Clara needs the money more than Vincent does, or for any other reason that's entirely up to them. Since then bandwidth has become orders of magnitude cheaper, and G has economies of scale that no other operator can get close to, they quite literally own the fiber, the endpoints and are present in just about every meet-me room all over the world. How much more tax are you willing to pay to have these extra utilities be run by govts? It would be fine for me if Youtube stopped operations and if all "income-oriented" content producers went away.
JavaScript is disabled in your browser.
Google's bandwidth and storage of those bytes isn't free. CubsFan 3 months ago root parent next [—] I'm curious -- what do you want to happen in this situation? Alphabet's primary goal is to turn the internet into cable and I honestly have no stomach for it. We sent a strong enough message to the company so that their CEO resigned and hit them hard in the wallet and now they know better. Hopefully the replacement will be less centralized and not beholden to a single american company. Maybe we have just too much content now. I do wonder if I'd get to see things like, say, Practical Engineering in an ad-free world. Definitely not giving Google any money. I only use ublock origin and privacy badger I therefore want to actively steal compute resources from companies whose business model is based on online advertising without giving them ad impressions and pay content creators that I like via other means such as Patreon. How many recipe sites would break? To know whether that is unreasonable or not you'd have to compare it to the cost of providing you that service, taking into account that youtube is just a delivery mechanism and so is infrastructure , not content. So the cost is borne by users' power bills, data rates and available bandwidth. Saris 3 months ago root parent next [—] What about someone who gets several million views per video they upload?
In my opinion you are not right. I can prove it.