Quanta magazine

Quantum algorithms can find their way out of mazes quanta magazine faster than classical ones, at the cost of forgetting the paths they took. In steganography, an ordinary message masks the presence of a secret communication.

Not the actual death of the magazine, just someone getting upset about lack of depth in an article. They simulated some aspects of wormhole dynamics under the crucial assumption that the holographic correspondence of the Sachdev—Ye—Kitaev model holds. I seriously doubt that many of it's readers have sufficiently deep knowledge of QC to properly understand the Sachdev—Ye—Kitaev model. Whatever that is. Edit: Just to be clear, I'm not disputing that the Quanta article is factually deficient - although I don't have the relevant specialist knowledge to understand why. I am disputing that this marks the "death" of the magazine.

Quanta magazine

Quantum algorithms can find their way out of mazes exponentially faster than classical ones, at the cost of forgetting the paths they took. A chemical trick for making oxygen can sustain whole underground ecosystems. In steganography, an ordinary message masks the presence of a secret communication. Melanie Mitchell says digital minds will never truly be like ours until they can make analogies. The physicist and computer scientist Stephanie Wehner is planning and designing the next internet—a quantum one. Quantum computers are improving at a doubly exponential rate. The rainbow of pigments that animals use for blood illustrates a central truth about evolution. Biologists have demonstrated for the first time that a controversial genetic engineering technology works, with caveats, in mammals. Neither animal, plant, fungus nor familiar protozoan, a strange microbe foretells incredible biodiversity yet to be discovered. Already a subscriber? Sign in. Thanks for reading Scientific American. Create your free account or Sign in to continue. See Subscription Options. Subscribe to Scientific American!

View on Apple Podcasts, quanta magazine. I won't speculate on the reasons for this, because I'm sure there quanta magazine many, but the end result is that they are desperate for crazy sounding physics discoveries, because it placates their desire for extreme technological progression. I meant that the magazine is not literally dead, but in the sense of "dead to me".

Illuminating basic science and math research through public service journalism. Quanta Magazine is an editorially independent online publication launched by the Simons Foundation to enhance public understanding of science. Why Quanta? The best traditional news organizations provide excellent reporting on applied areas of science such as health, medicine, technology, engineering and the environment. We strive to complement and augment existing media coverage. Our work often resembles journalistic alchemy — we mash together the complexities of science with the malleable art of storytelling in an attempt to forge a precious new alloy. It can be a mind-bending enterprise, but we relish the challenge.

Send feedback. Quanta Science Podcast. Listen to Quanta Magazine's in-depth news stories about developments in mathematics, theoretical physics, theoretical computer science and the basic life sciences. Quanta, an editorially independent magazine published by the Simons Foundation, seeks to enhance public understanding of basic research. Read more at QuantaMagazine. You've learned from Quanta. Now we want to learn from you!

Quanta magazine

Listen to Quanta Magazine's in-depth news stories about developments in mathematics, theoretical physics, theoretical computer science and the basic life sciences. Quanta, an editorially independent magazine published by the Simons Foundation, seeks to enhance public understanding of basic research. Read more at QuantaMagazine. You've learned from Quanta. Now we want to learn from you!

Cordoba el churrasco

As a mathematician I can say that all math articles I have read so far in Quanta Magazine have been excellent and they deserve praise! Scientific reporting is hard, the knowledge gaps between reporter, scientists and audience are usually very large and explaining an extremely difficult concept to non-expert audience is very challenging. Download as PDF Printable version. Why, it is almost like our political system would be destroyed. With proteins that reversibly self-assemble into droplets, cells may control their metabolism—and harden themselves against harsh conditions. It makes ridiculous claims, fundamentally misrepresenting what this research is, to make it sound cooler and more interesting. A bit more precisely, the correspondence relates the partition functions of quantum gravity in AdS with the partition functions of conformal fields. As a lay parson, when it comes to quantum mechanics I have to use my own set of heuristics to identify quackery: this Quanta's video checks almost all my indicators of low quality quantum woo - I don't like to say this about someone's else work but just the aesthetics reminds me to pseudo-scientific documentaries. The wormholes that Susskind et al. The "it's dead to me because of this one bad article" standard will leave one with no magazines and no newspapers that are worthy. Original title dec 1. Whatever that is. In this case the model happens to be using a quantum computer, and X happens to be some specific variety of wormhole. The physicist and computer scientist Stephanie Wehner is planning and designing the next internet—a quantum one. Simons Foundation.

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through the use of credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words.

Yes — that non-locality on the surface is because the braiding structure is non-local when projected. The problem is that those are not Star Trek type wormholes that let you move macroscopic matter across galaxies, but everyone outside the field immediately thinks of them thanks to decades of scifi popculture. Toggle limited content width. Purely speaking for myself, but I could tell it was metaphorical. Moreover, either editors are asleep at the wheel for allowing the practice and or they're under commercial pressures to print such crap—profit being more important than science news. Gene Drives Shown to Work in Female Mice Biologists have demonstrated for the first time that a controversial genetic engineering technology works, with caveats, in mammals January 28, — John Rennie, Jordana Cepelewicz and Quanta Magazine. Here's the tldr: It's a rant about details in one specific article. It seems to me the main reason for this is that the many journalists who engage in the practice don't actually understand the matter themselves and this is why they skip over such explanations and or they're rewriting stories from press releases without first fully researching them, etc. These physicists assume a universe with nothing in it, then populate it with physicists and quantum computers and wormholes. Neither animal, plant, fungus nor familiar protozoan, a strange microbe foretells incredible biodiversity yet to be discovered. Does this mean that the quantum system is a wormhole? Blogpost uses clickbait and overblown reaction to complain about clickbait and overblown reporting. In this case the model happens to be using a quantum computer, and X happens to be some specific variety of wormhole.