Samsung s23 vs iphone 14 camera comparison

Enjoy the hottest mobile tech storylines, delivered straight to your inbox.

Apple Samsung Featured Versus. If you are looking to buy a compact flagship smartphone in , then this dilemma would have probably come up at least once — "iPhone 14 Pro or Galaxy S23". While those two smartphones are not in the same price range, they are so frequently compared that we decided to pit them head to head and give you the complete breakdown, which is the best one of the two. You can compare the complete specs sheets or check our editor's assessment further below. The iPhone 14 Pro and Galaxy S23 are quite similar when it comes to footprint and thickness, something that's understandable given both phones pack 6. The iPhone is noticeably heavier than the Galaxy — it weighs 38 grams more — and that's because of the premium build.

Samsung s23 vs iphone 14 camera comparison

I put the two phones and their cameras head to head over the past several weeks, and the results may surprise you. Zoom capabilities clock in at 3x optical zoom and up to 30x digital. Both devices also feature optical image stabilization on the main and telephoto cameras. While the S23 and iPhone 14 Pro have similar camera specs, it all boils down to how each camera treats the colors, contrast, and exposure in the images that you capture. The Galaxy S23 image leans more on the cooler side of the spectrum, and the colors are slightly brighter and more vivid. The iPhone 14 Pro image, on the other hand, leans warmer and more realistic in terms of color. You can also see the finer details on the flower petals, which are much harder to see in the S23 photo. The background bokeh is more distorted with the iPhone version, though. Personally, I prefer the Galaxy S23 image here. Next is a photo of grass with drops of rain after a storm rolled through. The S23 picture makes the grass look much more vibrant and eye-catching. However, with the iPhone 14 Pro , the colors are again more realistic, the finer details like lines and texture in the grass blades are still there, and you can even see those details through the raindrops. Though the colors are more appealing in the Galaxy S23 shot, the iPhone 14 Pro version simply looks better overall. The Galaxy S23 image is warmer and has a nice tone to it, with colors looking rich and vibrant, even in the background. The lights also look more natural with less bokeh distortion.

No arguing against this claim, because you know that it is just true. Galaxy S23 3x iPhone 14 3x Pixel 7 3x. The Galaxy S23meanwhile, captured the colors of the ears much better, but it smoothed out the wall, as well as my fuzzy pink ears, more than it should have.

Last week, we published a camera comparison article between the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra review and the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max review , where we saw that the Samsung phone outclassed the iPhone in most scenarios. In daylight, practically every phone captures decent colours and gives great results. Night photography is the real test for cameras. The picture taken from the S23 has dark shadows and in fact, the bulb inside the temple is also overexposed. In contrast, the image captured by the iPhone 14 is noticeably brighter and the furniture is also quite visible in the frame. This makes iPhone 14 a better performer in low-light situations. I took the same shot with night mode on both phones.

Last week, we published a camera comparison article between the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra review and the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max review , where we saw that the Samsung phone outclassed the iPhone in most scenarios. In daylight, practically every phone captures decent colours and gives great results. Night photography is the real test for cameras. The picture taken from the S23 has dark shadows and in fact, the bulb inside the temple is also overexposed. In contrast, the image captured by the iPhone 14 is noticeably brighter and the furniture is also quite visible in the frame. This makes iPhone 14 a better performer in low-light situations.

Samsung s23 vs iphone 14 camera comparison

Samsung's telephoto cameras open up creative possibilities the iPhone can't match. Samsung's Galaxy S23 Ultra comes with wide. With its superior telephoto capabilities and an interesting megapixel main camera, I wanted Samsung's Galaxy S23 Ultra to teach Apple a lesson in how a flagship phone should handle digital photography. Not because I want Apple to lose, but because I want competition to improve everybody's smartphone photography. But even though the S23 Ultra camera specs look better than the iPhone 14 Pro's in many ways, I'm not going to declare it the better option for photographers. Nor is Apple the clear leader.

Melbourne university stop 1

I suspect Samsung is doing some sharpening in its computational raw processing. The iPhone did the best with this photo, striking a balance between dynamics, colors, and sharpness. Galaxy S23 1x iPhone 14 1x Pixel 7 1x. Facial details on the Pixel 7 are pretty good, but the iPhone 14 seems to be giving us the best balance with this shot, we feel. The iPhone 14 only has the wide and ultra-wide cameras, so you can only take wide portraits no zooming in to simulate a telephoto lens. It's the main reason these flagship phones cost so much more. Both phones failed at the challenging task of shooting at night toward a bright streetlight, with enormous, multicolored lens flare artifacts distracting from anything in the photo. Both phones have ultrawide cameras, after all. The Galaxy S23 — obviously — has a telephoto lens for a less distorted capture of facial features. The iPhone 14 also did quite good with exposure and dynamics here, but the details are way too soft and we can see some noise creeping in.

Gujarat Titans' Robin Minz meets with bike accident, under observation: report. Pakistan looks to mend ties with India, to celebrate National Day in Delhi: report. When it comes to picking out a new smartphone, two brands often dominate the conversation - Apple and Samsung.

Both the Apple and Samsung raw photos -- taking a page from Google's camera playbook -- employ a "computational raw" approach that actually merges multiple photos into one shot, taking advantage of the image processing methods that underpin conventional JPEG and HEIC photos. Over and over I got shots of my dog off the beaten track in deep snow, my kid running away from waves on the beach and other subjects I couldn't just walk closer to photograph, like this speaker at a conference. Read all comments Post your comment. At 3x, the Galaxy S23's dedicated 3x lens is helping it out, giving it the most natural details. The first photo was taken on a cloudy, overcast day, and shows that the Galaxy S23 used this fact to its advantage. I prefer the iPhone, though. But that doesn't capture as much detail when shooting at 50 megapixels or megapixels, which requires the phone to extrapolate color information. Pretty even performance all around here. The Galaxy did give us a colder cast here, but dynamics are well preserved and details are sharp. The Galaxy phone sharpens edges so tree leaves, blades of grass and other areas with lots of detail are a crispy, jittery mess. When it comes to shooting raw, Apple's experience is much better. The iPhone seemed to do what I wanted in some tricky shots better, though. To analyse the low-light camera performance further, let me share the results of the front camera in dim light. However, the iPhone 14 Pro seems to have more detail and contrast, though the sparkling lights in the bottom left look like tiny horseshoes.