Tamron 70 300 vc portrait

In August of Tamron released an updated version of its mm telephoto zoom lens, with a few notable improvements.

This has been a very welcome addition to the market, because the Nikkor had been alone price-wise, and third-party options were not up to the standards. Fortunately, the Tamron is a very viable alternative and it even has some characteristics that surpass its direct rival, as we will see. This mm is the first Tamron lens having the new USD Ultrasonic Silent Drive auto-focus motor for fast and silent focusing, and also the first including their innovative optical stabilizer mechanism, VC Vibration Compensation. Indeed, the lens is very silent and rather quick focusing, but may hunt at times in areas with low contrast, the same happening in low light situations, otherwise the lens focuses quickly. The Tamron is a big fat lens and even with the D is a little front-heavy, but not overly so. The lens allows full-time manual focusing without the need to turn the lens or camera to manual focus.

Tamron 70 300 vc portrait

Both have built in image stabilization and have a low dispersion glass element to improve image quality. Both have full frame coverage. But is it as good? I also used an EOS 5D to look at the image quality at the edges and corners of the full 35mm frame. After both "real world" and resolution target testing, on both APS-C and full frame sensors and looking at several hundred images I came to the following conclusions: The Canon and Tamron zooms are pretty much equal in terms of sharpness in the center of the image at all focal lengths from 70mm to mm. Both are very good for this class of lens. They're not quite up to prime lens levels of sharpness, but they can be surprisingly close. Both lenses are sharp wide open and improve a little on stopping down. However they can both be used wide open without worrying too much about image quality. Technically, the Tamron overall sharpness probably peaks at around f8 center and f11 corner at all focal lengths, but the difference between wide open and stopped down is quite small and shooting wide open and hence with a faster shutter speed or lower ISO setting will often give the best results. At mm the Tamron is sharper in the corners of the image than the Canon, especially when shooting with a full frame sensor, though there is still a difference in the corners of the APS-C frame. At mm there's little difference between the two lenses over the whole of the APS-C frame. Over the full 35mm frame the Tamron is a little better in the extreme corners. At 70mm there's really nothing to pick between the two lenses. Both show very similar sharpness at the same points in the frame, all the way out to the corners of the full frame image.

Now i switched to Nikon and i have the 35mm prime and the kit lens. We tamron 70 300 vc portrait 2 hours in the store making detailed comparisons using my MacBook with 2 other guys in the shop offering very valued, experienced but un-biased opinion including making crops of each image.

Yes i'm curious about it too. But i'm concerned it might still be too bulky for me despite being the most compact lens of its kind. Nonetheless it looks very interesting. Best regards, Mic. Hi Mic, it's amazing how much sharp this lens is! Which camera have you used here?

A clump of whitespirebirch tree trunks provides three-dimensionality within a narrow range of colors. Long focal lengths isolate a small area of view - offering a wide range of compositions of a scene visible from a single position. Sometimes all it takes to be a winner is to raise your arms when the picture is taken. Fields at the top of mountains allow for an undistracting sky background. Clumps of crocuses are not hard to find, but finding the right composition to capture them in is much more difficult. In this frame, I aligned the flowers so that they formed an extended S-curve through the frame.

Tamron 70 300 vc portrait

Tamron has been on a tear in the last few years on the Sony FE full frame E-mount platform, releasing one high-performing, reasonably priced zoom after another. This started with the very well received mm F2. Thus far Tamron has followed a fairly fixed formula: their zoom lenses on Sony all have weather sealing, good but not exceptional builds, outstanding autofocus capabilities, a universal 67mm filter thread, no switches on the barrel, and no VC Vibration Compensation, their name for an optical image stabilizer. Prefer to watch your reviews? Check out either the long format definitive review or shorter standard video reviews below:. Tamron mm F4. Please enable JavaScript. Thanks to Tamron USA for the loaner lens! As always, my reviews are completely independent. As noted as our intro, Tamron has followed a formula that has thus far proven to be a winning formula for them.

Peach blueberry inflation

Nicely sized and ribbed focus and zoom ring appear tightly integrated with the plastic lens barrel. The Tamron VC's minimum focusing distance is reasonable for a telephoto zoom lens and the resulting about-as-good-as-it-gets maximum magnification of. Here is a comparison of the aperture step down between the Tamron and some Canon telephoto lens models. The VC vibration compensation on this lens is exceptional! Focus breathing image changes size when focusing is noticeable at the wide end, but far less apparent to me at mm. The lens features a focusing scale in feet and meters in a recessed and windowed scale but does not feature an infrared index or a depth-of-field scale. For instance, the performance at mm is particularly good and looks even better than its 70mm. When I took my first shots with this lens, I was astonished. There are seven Nikon lenses with a 62mm filter size in my database, but Canon owners may be buying a set of filters specifically for this lens - a cost that must be considered. I think tamron improved the production quility of this lens lately. Please share this page! For the resolution test I shot the 5 Euro bill in the studio. Hope this helps!

Riding above the typical mm focal length range found in kit and general purpose lenses, the mm or similar focal length range is extremely popular - easily covering the range I typically recommend to someone interested in a second lens. Note: I don't consider the gap between 55mm and 70mm to be significant. Either way, the difference between 70mm and mm is obvious.

But in this blog we try to be as objective as possible. Focusing operations do not rotate the front element, making life that much easier for polarizer users. Since Tamron reverse engineers vs. Sadly, the price I paid is high and the reason is that I am living in Oslo, Norway the rest you should understand : I am amazed by the results this lens produce. It's most noticeable at longer focal lengths mm. This mm is the first Tamron lens having the new USD Ultrasonic Silent Drive auto-focus motor for fast and silent focusing, and also the first including their innovative optical stabilizer mechanism, VC Vibration Compensation. When reversed, the lens hood fits onto the lens compactly - but covers the entire zoom ring. It doesn't guarantee it. Great lens, if you are on Sony system, get it! Hi MeiL.